Patient education programmes and decision aids - evaluation of complex interventions
Revisión -
Vol.24 N.6 noviembre-diciembre 2008M. Lenz1, A. Steckelberg2, I. Mühlhauser31. Unit of Health Sciences and Education. University of Hamburg. Germany; 2. Unit of Health Sciences and Education. University of Hamburg. Germany; 3. Unit of Health Sciences and Education. University of Hamburg. Germany
Resumen
Patients have the right to make informed decisions on treatment
goals and treatment regimens and also to be provided with reliable
information necessary for decision-making. Evidence-based medicine
explicitly integrates patients” values and preferences in treatment
decisions. Both are regarded as crucial to increase both the
patients” quality of care and independence. Education programmes
or patient decision aids are complex interventions, typically comprising
separate components acting interdependently (e.g. content,
structure, and media of an education programme). They are heterogeneous
in their goals, methods and target populations. Development
and evaluation of complex interventions are sophisticated
processes requiring both qualitative and quantitative methods. In a
previous review we showed that common methodologies used in
systematic reviews do not allow adequate appraisal of complex interventions.
Patient education programmes were used as an example.
The present review outlines present developments in patient
education and shared decision making in diabetes care. It also comprises
an update of the previous review. Methodological challenges
of the development and evaluation of complex interventions are discussed.
Methods of current systematic reviews do still not meet the
challenges to appraise patient education and self-management programmes.
Since these are complex and heterogeneous interventions,
consideration of aggregated evidence is necessary. Information
necessary for the evaluation of such programmes is difficult or
impossible to identify. In conclusion we propose to establish a scientific
network and database, which supports scientific exchange and
systematic tagging of self-management programmes, patient education
programmes and patient decision aids.
Correspondencia
Correspondencia: M. Lenz. Unit of Health Sciences and Education. University of Hamburg.
Martin-Luther-King Platz, 6. 20146 Hamburg (Germany). E-mail: matthias.lenz@
uni-hamburg.de
Palabras clave
education hipertensión self-management systematic reviews Documento
Documento PDF» Anexos »
‹ Volver